|
June 12, 2023
Preparing Applications in Uncertain Conditions |
May 8, 2023
Competence is a Delicate Flower |
March 30 , 2023
Urgent! Very Hard to Meet a Limitation Period |
March 13 , 2023
Parties to Planning Appeals |
March 7 , 2023
Costs in Family Law Litigation |
January 30 , 2023
Dodging Settlement Privilege |
January 4 , 2023
Lurking Dangers and Errors |
January 3 , 2023
Your Real Goals |
December 5 , 2022
Contracts for Higher Costs |
November 24 , 2022
Scope of Offers to Settle |
October 13 , 2022
Checklist for Cross-Examination |
September 16 , 2022
Reviewing Latest Changes |
August 22 , 2022
First Steps in Problem Solving |
July 28 , 2022
Checklist of Powerful Procedural Principles |
March 22 , 2022
Repeating a Cross-Examination Question
|
January 25 , 2022
Enforcing Land Sales Becomes Easier |
January 5 , 2022
Proving a Settlement After a Mediation
|
November 16, 2021
Types of Injunctions
|
October 1, 2021
Orders After Litigation is Over
|
August 11, 2021
Discoverability for Limitation Periods
|
August 5 , 2021
Releases of Claims
|
June 7 , 2021
Language Used Still Matters
|
May 17 , 2021
Serving Uncooperative People
|
April 15 , 2021
Death and After-Life of Contingency Agreements
|
February 22 , 2021
Legal Analysis
|
February 2 , 2021
Costs Clarified at Last
|
January 4 , 2021
Urgent!
|
December 10, 2020
Traps and Confusion in Service Times
|
November 24, 2020
Don't Cut Corners
|
October 2 , 2020
Consent Orders
|
August 4 , 2020
Electronic Hearings
|
July 21, 2020
Ceasing to Act
|
June 29, 2020
Writing Skills
|
June 29, 2020
Keeping Up With the Law
|
June 22, 2020
Assets as a Test for Security for Costs
|
June 19, 2020
What is This Case About?
|
June 11, 2020
Cross-Examining Child Witnesses
|
May 20 , 2020
Formal Offers
|
May 13 , 2020
Vexatious or Self-Represented Litigants
|
January 7, 2020
G.S.T. and Costs
|
December 20 , 2019
Electronically Navigating the
Handbook
|
October 7 , 2019
Questioning is a Bad Word
|
July 29 , 2019
Dismissal for Delay
|
May 7 , 2019
Rule 4.31 Fallacies
|
March 18 , 2019
More Dangers in Oral Fee Agreements
|
February 11 , 2019
Weir-Jones Decisions
|
January 9 , 2019
Discouraging Settlements
|
November 30, 2018
European Court Helps You Twice?
|
November 23 , 2018
Courts Overruling Tribunals
|
November 16 , 2018
New Evidence on Appeal
|
October 30 , 2018
Schedule C's Role
|
July 17 , 2018
Loopholes in Enforcing Settlements
|
May 7 , 2018
Enforcement of Procedure Rules
April 16, 2018
Limping Lawsuits are Often Doomed
April 3 , 2018
Court of Appeal Tips for Summary Decisions
March 19, 2018
Serious Dangers in Chambers
Applications
February 13 , 2018
Court Backlog
December 18 , 2017
Lowering the Status of Courts
September 15 , 2017
Access to Court Decisions
July 4 , 2017
Strictissimi Juris
June 14 , 2017
Why Don't Your Clients Settle?
June 5 , 2017
Gap in Rules About Parties
June 5, 2017
Personal Costs Against
Solicitors
April 26, 2017
Clogged Courts
April 11, 2017
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
January 6, 2017
Incomplete Disclosure
December 15, 2016
Mediation
November 23, 2016
Is Contract Interpretation Law? |
|
Welcome
Côté’s Commentaries
© J.E. Côté 2016-2023
|
PREPARING APPLICATIONS IN UNCERTAIN CONDITIONS
|
What were the best ways to prepare written materials for an application are set out in my Systematic Advocacy book. But recent problems in the Alberta courts add to the topic. Now things take longer, there can be small puzzles, getting answers or correcting little errors is harder, and deadlines are more dangerous. (See my blog dated March 30, 2023, and the upcoming September 2023 issue of the Stevenson & Côté Handbook.)
So here are a few more tips to make the process go better and avoid disasters.
1. Early in the life of a file, warn your client in writing about
(a) deadlines,
(b) how long it will take to do the work to meet the deadlines,
(c) the bad effects of missing a deadline, and
(d) how many weeks before certain events you would need instructions, in order to take effective action in court.
2. You will have to carry out several tasks simultaneously. So a team approach and some delegation is very often desirable. If your office has someone very good with detail, paperwork, and organization, try to get some help from that person. Sometimes solicitors have more such skills than do barristers. Often only one (or part of one) task requires a detailed knowledge of the issues. Someone should prepare a folder or binder or electronic document giving the relevant sections of statutes, Rules of Court, Practice Directions, court website Announcements, and notes of unpublished changes, for the procedure for a certain general class of applications. Some of the types of work to be done may be fairly mechanical, having to do with timing, logistics, and the latest procedures (or backlogs), rather than with the merits.
3. Project management skills are very useful. Above all, you must not wait to start what you think is step 4, until after steps 1, 2, and 3 are completed. Any task which has no preconditions, or whose preconditions are now met, should be started at once. Try to detect more or less what is one path, i.e. a string of steps, each of which is a precondition to the next step, so that a delay in one delays all later steps in that long string. For example, do not wait until the end of the process to produce formal covers or end sheets for documents, whether these are electronic or paper (or both). You know their contents at the outset, so prepare them at the outset. When you identify strings of steps, try to see which string is the critical one. In other words, which string will take longer (even if all goes well) than the other strings take.
4. If no one in your office has prepared a court application in the last 60 days, someone should now become acquainted with all the actual on-the-ground processes and practicalities (and maybe shortcuts). Learn all that even before the client has definitely approved bringing an application or decided just what it will complain about or ask for.
5. List all your people and your client's people who may have to approve things, authorize things, provide evidence, or swear oaths. Then ensure that all of them will be available all through the process. Make sure none is likely to go on holiday or a voyage. Get now from each of those people every possible location, email address, cell-phone number, etc. which might be used (permanently or temporarily) to reach them. Learn reliably whether it will be possible to exchange documents, including pdf form or fax.
6. Try to learn how to contact someone in the court administration who can give you advice or help if you have a query or if something goes wrong. Someone who could look at a draft of a document and say early if it has problems of form, would be valuable. If you cannot find someone in the court administration, find a lawyer in another firm who files such documents frequently and knows what and when the courts will accept. It cannot cost that big a fee for advice on logistics or form.
– Hon. J.E. Côté
|
The Commentaries are intended to call the attention of lawyers to promising or threatening developments in the law, in civil procedure, in developing their skills, or simply to describe something curious, funny or intriguing.
The Hon. Jean Côté retired from the Court of Appeal of Alberta and would be willing to act as an arbitrator, mediator, or referee under Rules 6.44 and 6.45 of the Alberta Rules of Court.
He may be contacted through Juriliber at:
email: info@juriliber.com or phone 780-424-5345.
|
|