|
November 28 , 2023
Motions Fritter Away Time and Money |
November 27 , 2023
Will Foreclosure History Repeat Itself? |
November 21 , 2023
Rules of Court Bind Even the King's Bench |
November 2, 2023
Records and Affidavit of Records |
November 2 , 2023
Uncommon Law |
October 20 , 2023
Expanding Judicial Review Evidence |
June 22, 2023
Competition v. Benefits |
June 19, 2023
Clogged Courts |
June 12, 2023
Preparing Applications in Uncertain Conditions |
May 8, 2023
Competence is a Delicate Flower |
March 30 , 2023
Urgent! Very Hard to Meet a Limitation Period |
March 13 , 2023
Parties to Planning Appeals |
March 7 , 2023
Costs in Family Law Litigation |
January 30 , 2023
Dodging Settlement Privilege |
January 4 , 2023
Lurking Dangers and Errors |
January 3 , 2023
Your Real Goals |
December 5 , 2022
Contracts for Higher Costs |
November 24 , 2022
Scope of Offers to Settle |
October 13 , 2022
Checklist for Cross-Examination |
September 16 , 2022
Reviewing Latest Changes |
August 22 , 2022
First Steps in Problem Solving |
July 28 , 2022
Checklist of Powerful Procedural Principles |
March 22 , 2022
Repeating a Cross-Examination Question
|
January 25 , 2022
Enforcing Land Sales Becomes Easier |
January 5 , 2022
Proving a Settlement After a Mediation
|
November 16, 2021
Types of Injunctions
|
October 1, 2021
Orders After Litigation is Over
|
August 11, 2021
Discoverability for Limitation Periods
|
August 5 , 2021
Releases of Claims
|
June 7 , 2021
Language Used Still Matters
|
May 17 , 2021
Serving Uncooperative People
|
April 15 , 2021
Death and After-Life of Contingency Agreements
|
February 22 , 2021
Legal Analysis
|
February 2 , 2021
Costs Clarified at Last
|
January 4 , 2021
Urgent!
|
December 10, 2020
Traps and Confusion in Service Times
|
November 24, 2020
Don't Cut Corners
|
October 2 , 2020
Consent Orders
|
August 4 , 2020
Electronic Hearings
|
July 21, 2020
Ceasing to Act
|
June 29, 2020
Writing Skills
|
June 29, 2020
Keeping Up With the Law
|
June 22, 2020
Assets as a Test for Security for Costs
|
June 19, 2020
What is This Case About?
|
June 11, 2020
Cross-Examining Child Witnesses
|
May 20 , 2020
Formal Offers
|
May 13 , 2020
Vexatious or Self-Represented Litigants
|
January 7, 2020
G.S.T. and Costs
|
December 20 , 2019
Electronically Navigating the
Handbook
|
October 7 , 2019
Questioning is a Bad Word
|
July 29 , 2019
Dismissal for Delay
|
May 7 , 2019
Rule 4.31 Fallacies
|
March 18 , 2019
More Dangers in Oral Fee Agreements
|
February 11 , 2019
Weir-Jones Decisions
|
January 9 , 2019
Discouraging Settlements
|
November 30, 2018
European Court Helps You Twice?
|
November 23 , 2018
Courts Overruling Tribunals
|
November 16 , 2018
New Evidence on Appeal
|
October 30 , 2018
Schedule C's Role
|
July 17 , 2018
Loopholes in Enforcing Settlements
|
May 7 , 2018
Enforcement of Procedure Rules
April 16, 2018
Limping Lawsuits are Often Doomed
April 3 , 2018
Court of Appeal Tips for Summary Decisions
March 19, 2018
Serious Dangers in Chambers
Applications
February 13 , 2018
Court Backlog
December 18 , 2017
Lowering the Status of Courts
September 15 , 2017
Access to Court Decisions
July 4 , 2017
Strictissimi Juris
June 14 , 2017
Why Don't Your Clients Settle?
June 5 , 2017
Gap in Rules About Parties
June 5, 2017
Personal Costs Against
Solicitors
April 26, 2017
Clogged Courts
April 11, 2017
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
January 6, 2017
Incomplete Disclosure
December 15, 2016
Mediation
November 23, 2016
Is Contract Interpretation Law? |
|
Welcome
Côté’s Commentaries
© J.E. Côté 2016-2023
|
MOTIONS FRITTER AWAY TIME AND MONEY
|
Often there are long waits (and complications) before an application is heard and decided in the Court of King’s Bench. That eats up a lot of time and money. Often the wait greatly favors a defendant, especially a defendant with a weak defence. If your client has an arguable lawsuit or defence and will be prejudiced by delay, the situation is bad, but not 100% hopeless. What can you do about that?
-
Keep making reasonable, written suggestions and concessions to speed up the process. If your opponent is honest and dependable, even include litigation plans with deadlines. Keep updating those offers, to forestall any (probably unsound) suggestion that they were made too early in the suit. Try to make your suggestions comply with all the requirements for a formal settlement offer.
-
Do the same thing with proposals to settle the whole lawsuit. If a procedural or other dispute arises and an application is needed or pending, do the same thing with that dispute.
-
See if you can start with an application before a justice i.e. one outside the powers of an Applications Judge, as the lists for dates for the latter officers are often entirely full.
-
Go more than halfway to meet any procedural disputes, and offer to your opponent several alternatives. During an examination for discovery (questioning), try to restate and reword your question if it is objected to. Be slow to object to a question from the other side. If you must object, suggest how the opponent could amend or rephrase the question to remove any objection. After the session is finished, go over any objections which you have made and see if you can withdraw some of the objections and furnish an answer or a partial answer. Offer to put under oath such answers.
-
Be conservative in claiming or imposing or using any privilege or restrictions on any kind of disclosure. Work hard to ensure that your client digs up all relevant records or other information, and prepares very carefully for affidavits of records, or for being questioned, especially as a corporation’s representative. If you are in a hurry in this suit, make your affidavit of records informative. Do not use only two words (or zero words) to describe a big bundle. Always show which type of privilege applies to which records.
-
Do not make or resist an application unless you are satisfied that your position is reasonable, fair, likeable, and legally sound. In other words, that you have well over a 50% chance. And make sure the topic is important. If you are junior, get advice from an experienced litigator.
-
Use notices to admit facts, often accompanied by papers (such as copies of records) showing why the proposed admission is true. Draft the notices to make it hard for opposing counsel to give what in form is an answer, but in substance is not. (For clues about that, look at English precedents for interrogatories.)
-
Negotiate agreeing to having an application promptly arbitrated by a sole respected lawyer or retired judge.
-
Make use of mediation, judicial dispute resolution, a reference to a referee, or case management of the suit by a judge of some kind. The cost of mediation is usually comparatively low, even if the parties have to split a mediator’s fee.
-
Try to shave an application down short enough to be heard in ordinary morning chambers, especially at the end of the list. For example, have a brief supporting written argument.
-
See if your application can legitimately fit into the criteria for the Commercial List (which moves at a proper speed).
– Hon. J.E. Côté
|
The Commentaries are intended to call the attention of lawyers to promising or threatening developments in the law, in civil procedure, in developing their skills, or simply to describe something curious, funny or intriguing.
The Hon. Jean Côté retired from the Court of Appeal of Alberta and would be willing to act as an arbitrator, mediator, or referee under Rules 6.44 and 6.45 of the Alberta Rules of Court.
He may be contacted through Juriliber at:
email: info@juriliber.com or phone 780-424-5345.
|
|