|
Alderson B. once said to abusive cross-examining counsel “Mr. ______, you seem to think that the art of cross-examination is to examine crossly.”
- Serjeant Ballantine, Experiences of a Barrister’s Life 105 (1882)
Communis error sometimes creeps in not so much by positive doctrine or assertion as by mere assumption which is treated, and continues to be treated, as well founded only because it is not challenged. There are many principles of law which are regarded as so elementary that they need no demonstration by argument in court; but it sometimes happens that propositions which seem to be elementary, and thus grow into a communis error, are found, under criticism, to be disputable.
- Allen, Sir Carleton Kemp, Law in the Making 332-3 (7th ed. O.U.P. 1964)
Individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder have a pattern of unstable and intense relationships. … They may idealize potential caregivers or lovers at the first or second meeting. … However, they may switch quickly from idealizing other people to devaluing them … These individuals are prone to sudden and dramatic shifts in their view of others, who may alternately be seen as beneficent supports or as cruelly punitive. Such shifts often reflect disillusionment with a caregiver whose nurturing qualities had been idealized … These individuals may suddenly change from the role of a needy supplicant for help to a righteous avenger of past mistreatment. …
- American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders p. 707 (4th ed., text revision, 2000)
I will do right to all manner of people after the law and usages of this Realm without fear or favour, affection or ill-will.
- English High Court Judge’s oath of office, ca. 1941
If all the good people were clever
And all clever people were good,
The world would be nicer than ever
We think that it possibly could.
But alas! It is seldom or never
That the two hit it off as they should;
For the good are so hard on the clever
And the clever so rude to the good.
Indeed the two last of the lines might perhaps have been adapted:
For the Dons are so hard on the judges
And the judges so rude to the Dons.
- Serjeant Ballantine, Experiences of a Barrister’s Life 105 (1882)
The late Mr. Theobald Mathew – clarum et venerabile nomen – with his inimitable gift of condensation, has summarized once and for all the functions of a Judge of first instance. He should be ‘quick, courteous and wrong.’ Wrong, because otherwise there would be nothing left for the Court of Appeal to do. I wish Mr. Mathew could have found time to embalm the functions of a Judge of the Court of Appeal in some equally compact formula. Do not let us, however, jump to the conclusion that a Lord Justice should be ‘quick, courteous and right.’ This would run counter to Mr. Mathew’s own principle since no work would then be left for the House of Lords. The Lords of Appeal in Ordinary must not lightly be defrauded of their statutory prey.
- Sir Cyril Asquith, L.J., article in (1950 1 J.S.P.T.L. (ns) 350
But once Counsel has fully deployed his material and his submissions, there is in my view far more to be gained than lost by the heckling which follows. No doubt it is irksome to Counsel: but a litigant with a strong case has everything to gain and nothing to lose by this process. In its absence, both sides would be left in ignorance of what is passing in the tribunal’s mind, and where what is so passing is fallacious, would be denied the opportunity of correcting it.
- Sir Cyril Asquith, L.J., article in (1950 1 J.S.P.T.L. (ns) 356
Nothing is more dangerous than to allow oneself liberty to construct for the parties contracts which they have not in terms made by importing implications which would appear to make the contract more business-like or more just. The implications to be made are to be no more than are ‘necessary’ for giving business efficacy to the transaction: and it appears to me that both as to existing facts or future facts a condition should not be implied unless the new state of facts makes the contract something different in kind from the contract in the original state of facts.
- James Richard, Baron Atkin of Aberdovey, in
Bell v. Lever Bros. (HL(E 1931) 101 LJKB 129, 159
It is suggested that the deceased must have been, or ought to have seen, the tramcar, and had no right to assume it would have been slowed down, or that its driver would have ascertained that there was no traffic with which it might come in contact before he proceeded to apply his power and cross the thoroughfare. But why not assume these things? It was the driver’s duty to do them all, and traffic in the streets would be impossible if the drivers of all the other vehicles will do what it is their duty to do ̶ namely, observe the rules regulating the traffic of the streets.
- John, Baron Atkinson of Glenwilliam, in
Toronto Ry. v. King (PC(Ont) 1908) 77 LJPC 77, 80
Nobody could have been as wonderful as Marshall Hall then looked.
- Frederick Edwin Smith, Earl of Birkenhead, n.d. quoted by Sir Norman Birkett in
his Six Great Advocates 12 (1961).
Mr. Kenealy has ventured to suggest that the retainer of counsel in a case simply implies the exercise of his power of argument and eloquence. But counsel have far higher attributes, namely, the exercise of judgment and discretion on emergencies arising in the conduct of a cause … Few counsel, I hope, would accept a brief on the unworthy terms that he is simply to be the mouthpiece of his client.
- Colin Blackburn J. (later Lord Blackburn of Killearn), in
Strauss v. Francis (1866) LR 1 QB 379, 381
It was very good of God to let Carlyle and Mrs. Carlyle marry one another and so make only two people miserable instead of four.
- Samuel Butler (Nov. 21, 1884 letter)
…; and if juries do not prevent [libels] they may prove fatal to liberty, destroy Government and introduce anarchy; but tyranny is better than anarchy, and the worst Government better than none at all.
- Camden L.C.J. (formerly Charles Pratt), in
Entick v. Carrington (1765) 2 Wils KB 275, 292, 95 ER 807, 818
I have rarely heard a speech more precisely directed to the object under debate, more harmoniously attuned to the character of Committee discussion, than the excellent statement the Honourable and learned Gentleman has just made. It seemed to me that there could hardly be a more damaging speech from the point of view of the Attorney-General himself. Not only were his facts traversed, not only was his legal authority impugned and even controverted, but these sharp arrows were planted in his person by his distinguished legal successor in his old primacy on the Liberal benches. He has been able to answer him in fact and law and leave him a sprawling, and pitiable object.
- Right Hon. Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill, M.P., in Hansard,
June 17, 1930, quoted in Hyde, Norman Birkett 323 (1964)
Gentlemen, I have said before, and I take the freedom to repeat, that it is far more important the law should be administered with absolute integrity, than that in this case or in that the law should be a good law or a bad one. The moment juries or judges go beyond their functions, and take upon themselves to lay down the law or find the facts, not according to the law as it is, but according to the law as they think it ought to be, then the certainty of the law is at an end; there is nothing to rely upon; we are left to the infinite variety and uncertainty of human opinion; to caprice which may at any moment influence the best of us; to feelings and prejudices, perhaps excellent in themselves, but which may distort or disturb our judgment, and distract our minds from the single simple operation of ascertaining whether the facts proved bring the case within the law as we are bound to take it.
- John Duke, Lord Coleridge, C.J., in R. v. Ramsay (1883) 48 LT 733, 735
None are so fond of secrets, as those who do not mean to keep them; such persons covet secrets, as a spendthrift covets money, for the purpose of circulation.
- Colton, Rev. C.[aleb] C., Lacon or
Many Things in Few Words (1820) at p. 36
He that abuses his own profession, will not patiently bear with any one else that does so. And this is one of our most subtile [sic] operations of self-love. For when we abuse our own profession, we tacitly except ourselves; but when another abuses it, we are far from being certain that this is the case.
- Colton, Rev. C.[aleb] C., Lacon or
Many Things in Few Words (1820) at p. 42
There are minds so habituated to intrigue and mystery in themselves, and so prone to expect it from others, that they will never accept of a plain reason for a plain fact, if it be possible to devise causes for it that are obscure, far fetched, and usually not worth the carriage.
- Colton, Rev. C.[aleb] C., Lacon or
Many Things in Few Words (1820) at p. 42
Always suspect a man who affects great softness of manner, an unruffled evenness of temper, and an enunciation studied, slow, and deliberate. These things are all unnatural, and bespeak a degree of mental discipline into which he that has no purposes of craft or design to answer, cannot submit to drill himself. The most successful knaves are usually of this description, as smooth as razors dipped in oil, and as sharp. ̶ They affect the innocence of the dove, which they have not, in order to hide the cunning of the serpent, which they have.
- Colton, Rev. C.[aleb] C., Lacon or
Many Things in Few Words (1820) at p. 81
Much may be done in those little shreds and patches of time which every day produces, and which most men throw away, but which nevertheless will make at the end of it, no small deduction from the life of man. Cicero has termed them intercisiva tempora (cut up times), and the ancients were not ignorant of their value; nay, it was not unusual with them either to compose or to dictate, which under the operation of rubbing after the bath.
- Colton, Rev. C.[aleb] C., Lacon or
Many Things in Few Words (1820) at p. 204
… It was a serious contempt of court accompanied by unblushing lies on Woodall’s part; and the mere fact that no harm has been done in this particular case is neither here nor there. It would be unfortunate if the idea got abroad that if people threaten witnesses in this way, the worst that is likely to happen to them will be that they will have to pay some costs and make an apology. That is certainly not a course which I can adopt in this case. Nor do I think that the case is appropriate for a fine. This is a case in which I think it is my duty to make a committal order. … Weighing one thing with another, I propose to commit Woodall to prison for four weeks.
- Sir Geoffrey Cross J., in Re J.A.B. [1965] 2 All ER 175
In England the idea of legal equality, or of the universal subjection of all classes to one law administered by the ordinary courts, has been pushed to the utmost limit … every official, from the Prime Minister down to a constable or a collector of taxes, is under the same responsibility for every act done without legal justification as any other citizen. The Reports abound with cases in which officials have been brought before the courts, and made, in their personal capacity, liable to punishment, or to the payment of damages, for acts done in their official character but in excess of their lawful authority. A colonial governor, a secretary of state, a military officer, and all subordinates, though carrying out the commands of their official superiors, are as responsible for any act which the law does not authorize as is any private or unofficial person.
- Albert Venn Dicey, Law of the Constitution p. 193-94 (9th ed. 1952)
The ground of the application is stated to be public policy, which the Queen’s advocate seemed to think was of itself almost sufficient to induce the Court to grant the prayer. I cannot, however, hold to that view; it is necessary to show that the step proposed to be taken is comformable to law. Undoubtedly this Court, as all other Courts, is desirous to carry into effect the views of Her Majesty’s Government; nevertheless, it must not venture to go beyond the limits of legal authority. In a country governed by settled laws, it is necessary for Courts to be guided by those laws, and not by the will and desire of a Government.
- Sir John Dodson J. in Re Late Emperor Napoleon Bonapart (1853)
2 Robb Ecc 606, 608-9, 163 ER 1429, 1430
It is the function of a court of law to give effect to the enactments of the legislature according to the force of the language which the legislature has finally chosen for the purpose of expressing its intention. Speculation as to what may have been passing in the minds of the members of the legislature is out of place, for the simple reason that it is only the corporate intention so expressed with which the court is concerned. Besides that road ̶ the road of speculation ̶ leads into a labyrinth where there is no guide.
- Sir Lyman Poore Duff J., in Re Gray (1918) 57 SCR 150, 169, 42 DLR 1, 11
Arthur Miller, who sits on the Advisory Committee for the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, once observed that in many ways ‘[contemporary litigation is analogous to the] dance marathon contests. The object [of the exercise] is to get out on the dance floor, sort of hug your opponent, and move aimlessly and shiftlessly to the music with no objective in mind other than to outlast everybody else.’ That is precisely what happens in a great deal of civil litigation in our state and federal courts.
- Christine Durham J. (Utah Supreme Court), “Taming the ‘Monster Case’:
Management of Complex Litigation” (1986) 4 Law & Inequality 123, 124
Quote For The Day
… High-conflict personalities are in court because they are difficult, not because they have legitimate disputes. I believe that over the past ten years our courts have become a prime playing field for undiagnosed and untreated personality disorders. This is because the adversarial court process has a similar structure to their disorders … Purpose is deciding who is to blame; who is ‘guilty’ … Can hear or give testimony on past behavior of others …
- Bill Eddy, High Conflict People in Legal Disputes p. 41
(Janis Pub., Calgary 2006)
… [High-conflict personalities] are often effective at making innocent people look guilty, while at the same time with their desperate charm and aggressive drive they often succeed at looking innocent themselves.
- Bill Eddy, High Conflict People in Legal Disputes p. 42
(Janis Pub., Calgary 2006)
A more emotionally aggressive party (or attorney) may be more successful in capturing the attention and sympathies of the judge and jury … A more emotionally reasonable or passive party (many a true victim) can appear less persuasive … Ironically, … courts are more accurate when considering written information and documents only ̶ screening out visual and verbal peripheral distractions ... it appears that the Court of Appeals can often more accurately and objectively understand these cases, while trial courts seem to be more affected by peripheral persuasion.
- Bill Eddy, High Conflict People in Legal Disputes p. 44
(Janis Pub., Calgary 2006)
Gladstone “could convince most people of most things and himself of anything.”
- William Edward Forster (quoted in Roberts, Andrew, Salisbury:
Victorian Titan (London 1999), at p. 364
|
