|
December 15 , 2023
Limitation Periods Have Shrunk |
November 28 , 2023
Motions Fritter Away Time and Money |
November 27 , 2023
Will Foreclosure History Repeat Itself? |
November 21 , 2023
Rules of Court Bind Even the King's Bench |
November 2, 2023
Records and Affidavit of Records |
November 2 , 2023
Uncommon Law |
October 20 , 2023
Expanding Judicial Review Evidence |
June 22, 2023
Competition v. Benefits |
June 19, 2023
Clogged Courts |
June 12, 2023
Preparing Applications in Uncertain Conditions |
May 8, 2023
Competence is a Delicate Flower |
March 30 , 2023
Urgent! Very Hard to Meet a Limitation Period |
March 13 , 2023
Parties to Planning Appeals |
March 7 , 2023
Costs in Family Law Litigation |
January 30 , 2023
Dodging Settlement Privilege |
January 4 , 2023
Lurking Dangers and Errors |
January 3 , 2023
Your Real Goals |
December 5 , 2022
Contracts for Higher Costs |
November 24 , 2022
Scope of Offers to Settle |
October 13 , 2022
Checklist for Cross-Examination |
September 16 , 2022
Reviewing Latest Changes |
August 22 , 2022
First Steps in Problem Solving |
July 28 , 2022
Checklist of Powerful Procedural Principles |
March 22 , 2022
Repeating a Cross-Examination Question
|
January 25 , 2022
Enforcing Land Sales Becomes Easier |
January 5 , 2022
Proving a Settlement After a Mediation
|
November 16, 2021
Types of Injunctions
|
October 1, 2021
Orders After Litigation is Over
|
August 11, 2021
Discoverability for Limitation Periods
|
August 5 , 2021
Releases of Claims
|
June 7 , 2021
Language Used Still Matters
|
May 17 , 2021
Serving Uncooperative People
|
April 15 , 2021
Death and After-Life of Contingency Agreements
|
February 22 , 2021
Legal Analysis
|
February 2 , 2021
Costs Clarified at Last
|
January 4 , 2021
Urgent!
|
December 10, 2020
Traps and Confusion in Service Times
|
November 24, 2020
Don't Cut Corners
|
October 2 , 2020
Consent Orders
|
August 4 , 2020
Electronic Hearings
|
July 21, 2020
Ceasing to Act
|
June 29, 2020
Writing Skills
|
June 29, 2020
Keeping Up With the Law
|
June 22, 2020
Assets as a Test for Security for Costs
|
June 19, 2020
What is This Case About?
|
June 11, 2020
Cross-Examining Child Witnesses
|
May 20 , 2020
Formal Offers
|
May 13 , 2020
Vexatious or Self-Represented Litigants
|
January 7, 2020
G.S.T. and Costs
|
December 20 , 2019
Electronically Navigating the
Handbook
|
October 7 , 2019
Questioning is a Bad Word
|
July 29 , 2019
Dismissal for Delay
|
May 7 , 2019
Rule 4.31 Fallacies
|
March 18 , 2019
More Dangers in Oral Fee Agreements
|
February 11 , 2019
Weir-Jones Decisions
|
January 9 , 2019
Discouraging Settlements
|
November 30, 2018
European Court Helps You Twice?
|
November 23 , 2018
Courts Overruling Tribunals
|
November 16 , 2018
New Evidence on Appeal
|
October 30 , 2018
Schedule C's Role
|
July 17 , 2018
Loopholes in Enforcing Settlements
|
May 7 , 2018
Enforcement of Procedure Rules
April 16, 2018
Limping Lawsuits are Often Doomed
April 3 , 2018
Court of Appeal Tips for Summary Decisions
March 19, 2018
Serious Dangers in Chambers
Applications
February 13 , 2018
Court Backlog
December 18 , 2017
Lowering the Status of Courts
September 15 , 2017
Access to Court Decisions
July 4 , 2017
Strictissimi Juris
June 14 , 2017
Why Don't Your Clients Settle?
June 5 , 2017
Gap in Rules About Parties
June 5, 2017
Personal Costs Against
Solicitors
April 26, 2017
Clogged Courts
April 11, 2017
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
January 6, 2017
Incomplete Disclosure
December 15, 2016
Mediation
November 23, 2016
Is Contract Interpretation Law? |
|
Welcome
Côté’s Commentaries
© J.E. Côté 2016-2023
|
LIMITATION PERIODS HAVE SHRUNK
|
Maybe you thought that only the Legislature (or Parliament) can change limitation periods for suing. In theory maybe, but they have all shrunk in Alberta.
Lawyers cannot file anything at Court House counters. It takes days for the Clerk’s office to review and approve filing anything electronically. And even if successful, that filing is usually not backdated to the date of receipt of the document. Very small or understandable discrepancies can make the system (or a Clerk) reject a document received for filing. And the Clerk may send notice that the document was rejected, or a query about it, only after the limitation period has expired.
There is a special process for filing in a different site and way if a limitation period is close, but many lawyers have not noticed that. And if the limitation period is (say) 6 or 7 days away when the statement of claim is sent in electronically, some counsel or paralegals may assume that the limitation date is not close, because they think that ordinarily documents are accepted or rejected faster than that.
That problem is not theoretical; a recent reported case shows it happened in Calgary.
The courts usually have no power to extend limitation periods. Whether they can deem an originating document like a statement of claim to have been filed when it was received or before the Clerk ruled on it, is still not entirely clear. See Sabir v. Gill 2023 ABKB 679, JCC 2201 11259 (AJ). (For Court of Appeal filings, see R. 14.92(c).)
What should lawyers do?
Do not let your client postpone definite positive instructions to sue, appeal, or do whatever involves a time limit. Warn the client about the shorter de facto time limits.
-
Draft a Statement of Claim or Originating Application well before the date when you plan to submit it for filing. Do not wait to file it, without a very strong reason.
-
Treat 10 days before the limitation expires as if it were the last day to sue. If a certificate of pending litigation (lis pendens) is also needed, even that extra 10 days is much too short a margin for error.
-
Well beforehand, check carefully the processes for electronically filing any documents subject to any time limit (statutory, under the Rules, or under some court order).
-
Don't leave filing up to staff alone. Keep the lawyer involved in filing, when the limitation period is less than a month away.
-
Have a second lawyer familiar with litigation check over the document to be submitted, to ensure there are no flaws which could lead to rejection.
-
Have two people present and watching the computer when the document is electronically submitted for filing. The above Sabir case shows that one simple slip of a finger can silently kill everything, with no warning.
-
What if, by some horrible happening, a statement of claim has to be submitted on the last day for suing? Maybe you could draft it as if there were no lawyer and send the client and some helper over to the Clerk’s counter for filing? (And not just ten minutes before the counter closes, either.) The lawyer could then get onto the record, after the filing. Whether all that would be considered unethical, however, I do not know.
-
Pray a lot; you may need a miracle.
– Hon. J.E. Côté
|
The Commentaries are intended to call the attention of lawyers to promising or threatening developments in the law, in civil procedure, in developing their skills, or simply to describe something curious, funny or intriguing.
The Hon. Jean Côté retired from the Court of Appeal of Alberta and would be willing to act as an arbitrator, mediator, or referee under Rules 6.44 and 6.45 of the Alberta Rules of Court.
He may be contacted through Juriliber at:
email: info@juriliber.com or phone 780-424-5345.
|
|